Showing posts with label RTI Act of India. Show all posts
Showing posts with label RTI Act of India. Show all posts

Friday, 20 September 2013

Foreign Correspondent's Club of South Asia, Ministry of I&B,




MOIAB/R/2013/60438

20/09/2013

Please provide me full information on:-

1) Terms and conditions of tenancy  by The Foreign Correspondents Club of South Asia, AB-19, Mathura Road, New Delhi: 110001

2) Status vis-a-vis Indian Government of The Foreign Correspondents Club of South Asia, AB-19, Mathura Road,
New Delhi: 110001

3) Adherence to RTI Act of India 2005 by the said Foreign Correspondents Club of South Asia in as much as it is a Public Authority as defined variously and steps taken if any by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting to ensure adherence by Foreign Correspondents 

Thank you.


Veeresh Malik

RTI on AICTE re cars and expenses



DOARE/R/2013/60420

16/09/2013





Reference AICTE (All India Council of Technical Education), please provide me with following information:-

1) Details and information on motor vehicles provided to following persons at AICTE:-

-  Prof. S. S. Mantha, Chairman, AICTE

- Dr. Avinash S. Pant, Vice Chairman, AICTE

- Prof. (Dr.) Kuncheria P. Isaac, Member Secretary, AICTE

- Prof. R. P. Yadav, Chairman, North Western Regional Committee, AICTE

2) Information on whether motor log books are maintained for vehicles provided to above persons and in what format.

3) Extract of log books for motor vehicles provided to above people for month of August 2013

Thank you

Veeresh Malik

Monday, 9 September 2013

RTI on DoP&T for CIC RTI 8th Convention in Delhi


DOP&T/R/2013/63675

04/09/2013


Please provide me with information pertaining to recent CIC RTI 8th Convention held on 2nd and 3rd September 2013 by Central Information Commission.

1) Process by which delegates were selected.

2) Precise definition of VVIPs and VIPs as used.

3) Security instructions due to which delegates were not allowed to carry electronic gadgets like phones, cameras, laptops, computers into DRDO Bhavan while organisers, VVIPs, PSU/CIC/CPIO/IC/SIC/waiters and others were.

4) Expenses incurred on out of station delegates for travel, board and lodging.

5) Information on scent or pesticide or similar sprayed in hall through ventilation system minutes prior arrival of President of India.

6) Process by which some invitees were given red parking stickers and some invitees were given green parking stickers and reasons thereof, if any, for this segregation.

7) Steps taken, if any, to include social media and online media for next CIC RTI Convention as assured by CIC designate to undersigned.


++++++

09/09/2013
RemarksRemarks :- As the information sought by you pertains to Central Information Commission. Hence the application is being forwarded to that Department vide OM No. 2/2/2013-RTIC/63675 dated 09/09/2013 under Section 6(3) of the RTI Act, 2005.
For further query you may approach to that Department.

Sunday, 8 September 2013

RTI on Legislative Department for how many VIPs / VVIPs??


LEGIS/R/2013/60002

08Sept'13


Please provide me with the following information:-

In terms of the definition of VIP provided to me by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, vide para 4 of their SECRET letter No.VI-23014/345/05-VS dated 13/18 of July06 to me, I would like to know how many VIPs and VVIPs there are currently ondate within the administrative authority of the Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha Secretariats. Please provide me only with the number, not the details of the persons concerned. 


2)  In terms of the definition of VIP provided to me by the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, vide para 4 of their SECRET letter No.VI-23014/345/05-VS dated 13/18 of July06 to me, I would like to know how many VIPs and VVIPs there are currently on 31st of July 2006 within the administrative authority of the Legislative Department.. Please provide me only with the number, not the details of the persons concerned. 

RTI on Rashtrapati Bhavan wrt gardens, expenses, incomes and exemptions/utilisations



PRSEC/R/2013/60204

08sept'13

Please provide me with full information on, wrt gardens and horticulture in Rashtrapati Bhavan New Delhi:-

1) Expenses incurred in upkeep and maintenance of Mughal Gardens.

2) Expenses incurred in upkeep and maintenance of Herbal Gardens.

3) Expenses incurred in upkeep and maintenance of any other gardens.

4) Any other expenses related to horticulture.

5) Income generated, if any, from these horticultural activities.

6) Record of distribution or utilisation of produce from these above horticultural gardens.

7) Income generated from sale of tickets for visits to above gardens.

8) Record of free visits and exemptions from buying tickets, if any, for visits to above gardens.

Thank you.

Saturday, 7 September 2013

Ministry of Railways fresh RTI on quotas and VIPs





07-09-2013


MORLY/R/2013/60827


INFORMATION REQUIRED:- In context with HOR Quota, VIP quota following information may kindly be provided under the RTI Act of India, 2005. 1) Please provide me with information on exact and precise definition of the term VIP as used by Indian Railways in the documents referred to in A and B below. 2) Please provide me with precise and exact information on what is the well established practice being followed since long as used in document under A appended below in context with berths/seats being earmarked for said HOR quota. 3) Please provide me with exact and precise information on under what authority centralised data on reservation quota on trains running on Indian Railways are not maintained 4) Please see clause 1 in document under B below:- (i) The Emergency Quota on different trains will be released by the Railway authorities nominated for this purpose from time to time and please provide me with information on who these Railway Authorities nominated are. 5) Please provide me with exact and precise information on what happens to the unutilised upper berths in 1AC when HOR/VIPs are travelling by 1AC under clause (vii) where In case a 4-berth compartment is to be allotted to an HOR holder in the absence of a coupe, a) two HOR holders may be clubbed together in a 4 berth compartment and b) if clubbing of two HOR holders into a 4 berth compartment is not feasible and a Member of Parliament happens to be travelling by the same train, the latter may be allotted accommodation in the 4-berth compartment along with an HOR holder. 6) Please provide me with exact and precise information on the meaning of the term status of the passenger travelling as used 7) Please provide me with information on policy of alloting lower berths only to all HOR/VIP quotas.

Govt official medical treatment abroad open ended costs to be borne by taxpayers? DoPT RTI





DOP&T/R/2013/63757

07sept'13




Please provide me with following information:-

1) Copy of DoPT letter to Chief Secretaries of all States dated 02nd September 2013 pertaining to Government bearing actual cost of medical treatment abroad for upto two months for IAS, IPS and IFS officers as reported in Economic Times of today vide article appended below:-

Treatment abroad: Government to reimburse the total cost incurred by bureaucrats
By Aman Sharma, ET Bureau  7 Sep, 2013, 05.59AM IST

NEW DELHI: An ailing economy and an emerging destination for medical tourism, India has just made it easier for its bureaucrats and their immediate family members to fly abroad for treatment at the governments expense.

The Centre has decided to reimburse the total cost of treatment abroad as well as fund the return airfare for IAS, IPS and IFS officers, changing the 30-year-old rules at a time the government is facing flak for the countrys worrisome fiscal health just months ahead of the general elections.

In a vigorous modification to the 1983 rules that some critics have derided as something of a killer overdose in an economy that needs urgent belt-tightening, the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) has informed the chief secretaries of all states on September 2 through a letter, a copy of which has been accessed by ET, that the government will bear the actual cost of treatment abroad for two months.

The previous rules did not include airfare, and the government reimbursed the medical expenditure only to the extent the same treatment would cost in a private ward at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) in New Delhi.

As per the revised rules, the government will reimburse airfare not only for the bureaucrat but also one accompanying attendant subject to a decision by a committee of bureaucrats to be set up at the state and central levels.

The entitlement for the airfare as well as the medical treatment will now be the same as that of an IFS officer of the corresponding grade stationed abroad.

Given the high entitlement of an IFS officer overseas, every bureaucrat can easily claim the actual medical expenses abroad. Government officers were facing a lot of financial hardship due to the earlier rules, said a DoPT official, who did not wish to be named, describing the modifications as progressive while admitting that the new rules might end up burning a hole in the governments pocket given the high cost of medical treatment abroad.

2) Copy of file pertaining to the above letter along with file notings.

Thank you
Veeresh Malik

Friday, 6 September 2013

PMO RTI on clubs on government land (Breach Candy Mumbai)




Prime Minister's Office

05sept'13

PMOIN/R/2013/60132



Briefly, this is the issue:- Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust, Breach Candy, Mumbai, stands on land owned by the Government of India. 

In order to understand the various points it is necessary to look at the history of this institution and how it came to be set up.  It seems that a trust deed was executed on 3-2-1876, between the Secretary of State for India in Council and the Municipal Corporation of the City of Bombay, by which deed the Municipality was given a plot of land on the foreshore at Breach Candy in Bombay and the object of the trust was the construction and maintenance of a salt water swimming bath for the use and benefit of European public of Bombay. The Municipality carried on this trust for some time and a salt water swimming bath was erected.

In other words, the submission here is that the Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust is a Public Authority by virtue of it having being substantially financed as defined by the RTI Act of India by virtue of land being given free, as well as being on land which belongs to the Government of India.

It is also submitted that all business of Secretary of State for India was transferred to the Indian Government on 14/15 August 1947.

I may therefore kindly be provided the information sought under the RTI Act of India.




INFORMATION REQUIRED:-


a) Please provide me with full and precise information on  rules, regulations and byelaws of the Public Authority, the Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust.

b) Please provide me with full and precise information on terms and conditions of lease with the Bombay Municipal Corporation, if any, or any other body, from inception to-date.

c) Please provide me with full and precise information on adherence in selection of members at Breach Candy Swimming Bath Trust, if any, for people from SC/ST and EWS.

d) If any of the above said statutory records are not available, the complete details of how they were destroyed / weeded out in each case.

e) Efforts made by Indian Government, if any, since Independence to recover this land and buildings on it.

Thanking you

Veeresh Malik

Planning Commission, PPP, RTI, consultants and what about their adherence to RTI please?



Planning Commission

06th September 2013

PLCOM/R/2013/60164






1) Please provide me with information on status and progress and action taken as well as follow-up by Planning Commission with Law Ministry or elsewhere, if any, on the following. Please refer to PIB eRelease No. 70554 dtd 04march11 titled -Montek Clarfies on Application of RTI Act on PPP Projects. In this press release quoted below:-

 (Some observations made by Deputy Chairman, Planning Commission Mr Montek Singh Ahluwalia regarding application of the RTI Act to PPP projects have been quoted out of context by media. The factual position is, therefore, being clarified through this Press Release.

The Chief Information Commissioner had sent a letter to the Dy. Chairman, Planning Commission suggesting that conditions should be built into every PPP agreement requiring the respective concessionaire to provide information regarding their projects under the RTI Act.

The aforesaid letter of CIC has been referred by the Planning Commission to the Law Ministry for advice regarding the appropriate response. This is because Information Commissions are statutory authorities, and their role and jurisdiction is determined by the RTI Act. Any clarification by the Planning Commission can neither expand nor restrict their role. It is for the Information Commissions to decide, whether and to what extent, the provisions of RTI Act are attracted by the PPP concessionaires. The Deputy Chairman is in favour of full disclosure by public authorities of all relevant aspects of PPPs and performance under them.

It is further clarified that concession agreements are executed by the respective Ministries and not by the Planning Commission. So far as the Planning Commission is concerned, it has published several Model Concession Agreements (MCAs) for PPP projects. These MCAs provide for full disclosure of the Concession Agreement, the Maintenance Manual, the Maintenance Programme and the Maintenance Requirements in respect of each project. Where an MCA is followed, any person can obtain certified copies of these documents from the respective concessionaires.

NNK/RK
(Release ID :70554)

2) Please provide me with information including file notings if any on documents pertaining to media report that states that Planning Commission has suggested key infrastructure ministries to review the role and responsibilities of consultants who help the government implement public-private partnership projects.

WiFi and computers at Lok Sabha, Rajya Sabha, and an RTI on the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs



06sept'13

Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs


MOPAF/R/2013/60054


This refers to wi-fi connectivity in the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha. This also refers to reports that in last calendar year, nearly 3 lakh attempts were made to access adult websites in British House of Parliament, information obtained under British Freedom of Information Act.

Please provide me with information on:-

1) How many attempts have been made by computers in Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha to access adult content in FY 2012-2013.

2) How many MPs have availed of the funds and attended the familiarisation workshop for  using Apple iPad or Android-based Samsung Galaxy Tab for which they are provided Rs 50,000

3) What happens to the said Apple iPad or Android based Samsung Galaxy Tab once the MPs are no longer MPs.

Thank you
Veeresh Malik

Thursday, 5 September 2013

Willingdon Sports Club, Mumbai, Ministry of Defence


Willingdon Gymkhana, is it is a serving Naval Officer there??

04sept'13


MODEF/R/2013/60281


Kindly provide me with information on action taken after receipt of the below appended email which is self explanatory, sent to the Indian Navy.

Thank you

Veeresh Malik







---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Veeresh Malik veereshmalik@gmail.com
Date: 9 July 2012 10:11
Subject: Fwd: RTI Application / Willingdon Spors Club Mumbai / 30un2012 / Veeresh Malik
To: dmpr-navy@nic.in
Cc: Secretary secretary@willingdonclub.com, Veeresh Malik veereshmalik@gmail.com


July 9, 2012


To: The Chief of Naval Staff,
Admiral Nirmal Kumar Verma
PVSM, AVSM, ADC
Chief of the Naval Staff
Indian Navy,
Sena Bhavan, New Delhi - 110011
New Delhi

cc: JDMPR (OI & R)
Room No 205, C Wing
Sena Bhawan, New Delhi -110011


Greetings and Jai Hind.

Please note that I am getting messages from one Cmde. K.N. Bhagat,
Secretary of Willingdon Club in Mumbai, who is not clarifying whether
he is a serving officer of the Indian Navy or retired, and is instead
trying to claim that it is nobodys business but his own.

It is my humble submission that this is a serious mis-representation,
and that suitable action be taken by the Indian Navy in this context,
since the rules on how retired Armed Forces officers present
themselves to the public are very clear and known.

Needless to state, misrepresentation by retired officers can and has
led to serious consequences, much reported in the media lately. For
example, here is one not much reported



I shall also be following up with Ministry of Defence as well as PG
Cell of PMO in this context, as well as by RTI.

Email exchanged are enclosed.

Sincerely,

Veeresh Malik
D-61, Defence Colony,
New Delhi 110024






July 9, 2012


Dear Shri Malik,

1. It must not be your concern whether I am serving or retired as long
as you get response to your email.

2. As far as intimation is concerned, on the contrary, the tone and
tenor of your mail is very intimidating.

3. You seem to be extremely well informed about the laws of the land,
however, our response to your demand stands the same as intimated to
you earlier.

 Cmde. K.N. Bhagat, VSM
 Secretary
Willingdon Sports Club
Mumbai

RTI filed on Rashtrapati Bhavan wrt vehicles, VVIP, social media, expenses



04 september 2013

PRSEC/R/2013/60193

Please provide me with information on:-

1) Procedure for sanction of purchase of motor vehicles for Presidents Secretariat.

2) Procedure for sanction of purchase of motor vehicles for Governors and Lt. Governors in various States and Union Territories of India.

3) Status of implementation of renewable energy options in various premises under the Presidents Secretariat in India.

4) Precise definition of the terms VVIP and VIP as used by Presidents Secretariat and also at functions where the President of India is present.

5) Social media initiatives, if any, at the Presidents Secretariat - viz:- Facebook, Twitter or similar accounts.

6) Where I can get centralised information on expenses on account of various Raj Bhavans and Governors establishments in India.

7) Information on expenses incurred by Presidents Secretariat on red beacons installed on motor vehicles for last 5 financial years including ongoing Financial Years.

Thank you for your kind cooperation.

Saturday, 30 June 2012

RTI Application on Willingdon Sports Club, Mumbai




To:-- The CPIO under the RTI Act of India, or incumbent thereof, Willingdon Sports Club, K Khadye Marg, Tulsiwadi, Mumbai 400 034

dtd: 30th June 2012
Greetings & Jai Hind!!  Most humbly request information under the RTI Act of India, 2005,  please provide me with the following information. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT by me, an Indian Citizen, ALSO IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, this RTI Application shall be mounted on the public domain, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR. In this context, please also read the following decision from the office of the Central Information Commission, which has relevance to this RTI query.


INFORMATION REQUIRED:-

a) Please provide me with full and precise information on  rules, regulations and byelaws of your Public Authority, the Willingdon Sports Club.
b) Please provide me with full and precise information on terms and conditions of lease with the Bombay Municipal Corporation, from inception to-date.
c) Please provide me with full and precise information on adherence in selection of members at your Public Authority to reservations, if any, for people from SC/ST and EWS.
d) Please provide me with full and precise information on "substantially financed" as defined by the RTI Act of India, to your Public Authority, since inception.
e) If any of the above said statutory records are not available, the complete details of how it was destroyed / weeded out in each case..

f) Electronic access to the catalogue (or catalogues) of all records of your public authority duly indexed in a manner and the form to facilitate right to information, either over the computer networks or in the form of a diskette or other electronic media at the prescribed fees.

Sent by eMail and signed hard copy, self-verified as citizen of India, (signed) and humbly submitted,




from:- Veeresh Malik, D-61, Defence Colony, New Delhi -110024 mobile 0-99118-25500
Note 1:-Application fee of Rs. 10/- in cash shall be submitted within 30 days as per procedure laid down by DoP&T at PIO, Willingdon Sports Club, Mumbai, or at any one of the nominated APIOs located at the specified Post Offices in India, and a copy of this application along with receipt shall be sent to you co-terminus. Interim, you are requested to commence processing this RTI Application as per the RTI Act-2005 with effect from date of submission of this electronic copy, also as per the RTI Act-2005.

Note 2:- The public authority, Willingdon Sports Club Mumbai, has not yet published their arrangements to accept / accompany electronic payments for e-filings as per section 6 of the Information Technology Act 2000, is requested to do same, - and hence I am constrained to go to extra expense / trouble to file a routine email request by Postal Department also.

Note 3:- I wish to specify that you may please not provide to me that information (or particular portion thereof) which would impede the prosecution of offenders under any law of India, and also any personal information which is unconnected with any public activity/interest or which invades the privacy of any person. THIS INFORMATION IS ALSO SOUGHT IN THE LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.

Noe 4:- Humbly also submitted that section 8(2) of RTI Act clearly mentions that “A public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests”. In present case even section 8(1)(j) is applicable for the information sought. Also it leaves no scope to invoke section 11 of RTI Act for seeking ‘third party’ comments. However since various CIC-verdicts allow protection in form of hiding certain information likely to be misused, bank-details etc in the sought information may be hided by putting a whitener on the relevant portions of the documents to be provided.  In case RTI petition relates to some other public-authority, please transfer this RTI petition to CPIO there under section 6(3) of RTI Act.

(Postal-order number __________________ _______________ for rupees ten is enclosed with signed hard-copy towards RTI fees in name of “Accounts Officer” as per DoPT circular-number No.F.10/9/2008-IR dated 05.12.2008.)

+++

with copies to all affilliated clubs of this club.

Tuesday, 21 June 2011

Why do some people get tolls exempted, RTI to MoRTH

Going to get to the bottom of this business of everybody and his uncle/aunt exempted.

+++

dtd 01st June 2011

To:

The CPIO, Shri Anand Prakash or incumbent, Dir. (RTI) – Nodal Officer,
Ministry of Road Transport & Highway, Room No.531, Transport/Parivahan Bhavan, 1, Parliament Street, New Delhi-110001
 
Greetings & Jai Hind!!

Most humbly request information under the RTI Act of India, 2005,  Please provide me with the following information in ENGLISH.  Notes:- (1) I wish to specify that you may please not provide to me that information (or particular portion thereof) which would impede the prosecution of offenders under any law of India, and also any personal information which is unconnected with any public activity/interest or which invades the privacy of any person.   (2) THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.

1) Provide me with information on whether any person or entity has/have asked your Public Authority in the last 7 years for exemption from paying tolls/user fees on roads/highways/bridges in India and what the process is at the Ministry pertaining to correspondence/communication from persons/entities who have asked the Ministry of Road Transport & Highways for exemption from the payment of (user fees) tolls on roads, highways, bridges.
 
2) Provide me with information on the background and process of insertion of Rule 11 "Exemption from payment of fee" of National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Colection) Amendment rules, 2010, as notified by the Gazzette of India Extraordinary dated 03dec2010, also known as Rule 11 of NH Fee Rules. There should be some documents/file-notings/correspondence etc relating to this Rule, also related documents/correspondence/file-notings , and same may kindly be provided to me.
 
3) Provide me with information on whether following categories of road users are exempted from payment of user fees/toll on roads, highways, bridge:-
a) Member of Parliament.
b) Member of Legislative Assembly
c) Diplomats.
d) India - Pakistan Bus Service vehicles.
e) Hearses.
f) Stage-Carriages.
 
4) If any of the above said statutory records is not available, the complete details of how it was destroyed / weeded out in each case.
 
5) Electronic access to the catalogue (or catalogues) of all records of your public authority duly indexed in a manner and the form to facilitate right to information, either over the computer networks or in the form of a diskette or other electronic media at the prescribed fees.
 
Sent by eMail and signed hard copy, (signed) and humbly submitted,
 
Veeresh Malik,  D-61, Defence Colony, New Delhi - 11oo24   (mobile: 00-91-99118-25500)
 
Note 1:- Application fee of Rs. 10/- in cash shall be submitted within 30 days as per procedure laid down by DoP&T at PIO, MoRT&H, New Delhi or at any one of the nominated APIOs located at the specified Post Offices in India, and a copy of this application along with receipt shall be sent to you co-terminus. Interim, you are requested to commence processing this RTI Application as per the RTI Act-2005 with effect from date of submission of this electronic copy, also as per the RTI Act-2005. Note 2:- The public authority, Office of MoRT&H, New Delhi, has not yet published their arrangements to accept / accompany electronic payments for e-filings as per section 6 of the Information Technology Act 2000, is requested to do same, - and hence I am constrained to go to extra expense / trouble to file a routine email request by Postal Department also.

POSCO flanking RTI # 2 on issues JagatSinghPur to PMO


To:- Ms. Sanjukta Ray,  Central Public Information Officer, Prime Minister's Office, South Block, New Delhi - 110101.
cc:-  Shri K. Salil Kumar,  Central Public Information Officer, Prime Minister's Office, South Block, New Delhi - 110101
dtd: 08th June 2011
Greetings & Jai Hind!!  Most humbly request information under the RTI Act of India, 2005,  please provide me with the following information. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.

+++

INFORMATION REQUIRED:-

a) Please provide me with information on action taken, if any, including file notings, on letter to Prime Minister of India from Mr. EAS Sarma of Vishakapatnam, dated 14th July 2010, copy enclosed as enclosure A.
b) Please provide me with information on action taken, if any, including file notings, on letter to Prime Minister of India from Mr. EAS Sarma of Vishakapatnam, dated 07th May 2011, copy enclosed as enclosure B.

c) Please provide me with information on all communications to and from Prime Minister's office pertaining to visit by South Korean President, Shri Lee Myung-Bak, who was the invited State Guest of Honor for India’s 60thRepublic Day celebrations in 2010, that pertained to the POSCO basis the following:-

d) If any of the above said statutory records is not available, the complete details of how it was destroyed / weeded out in each case..

e) Electronic access to the catalogue (or catalogues) of all records of your public authority duly indexed in a manner and the form to facilitate right to information, either over the computer networks or in the form of a diskette or other electronic media at the prescribed fees.


Sent by eMail and signed hard copy, (signed) and humbly submitted,

Veeresh Malik,
D-61, Defence Colony,
New Delhi - 11oo24
(mobile: 00-91-99118-25500)

Note 1:-Application fee of Rs. 10/- in cash shall be submitted within 30 days as per procedure laid down by DoP&T at PIO, PMO, New Delhi, or at any one of the nominated APIOs located at the specified Post Offices in India, and a copy of this application along with receipt shall be sent to you co-terminus. Interim, you are requested to commence processing this RTI Application as per the RTI Act-2005 with effect from date of submission of this electronic copy, also as per the RTI Act-2005.

Note 2:- The public authority, PMO, New Delhi, has not yet published their arrangements to accept / accompany electronic payments for e-filings as per section 6 of the Information Technology Act 2000, is requested to do same, - and hence I am constrained to go to extra expense / trouble to file a routine email request by Postal Department also.

Note 3:- I wish to specify that you may please not provide to me that information (or particular portion thereof) which would impede the prosecution of offenders under any law of India, and also any personal information which is unconnected with any public activity/interest or which invades the privacy of any person. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.

+++
2.2  Role of the Executive:  Prime Minister, Chief Minister and Ministers — Serving POSCO Instead of People
While the MoU itself is only a statement of intention, it is during the implementation of the MoU requirements that the perversion of the State’s role comes to the foreground as the entire machinery of government, starting from the Offices of the Prime Minister and the Chief Minister, reaffirms its commitment to this blatant giveaway of India’s wealth, even as people on the ground steadfastly oppose it.
This preference for POSCO over people was on display in January 2010, when the South Korean President, Lee Myung-Bak, was the invited State Guest of Honor for India’s 60thRepublic Day celebrations.  Concerned over the lack of progress on the plant in the face of stiff resistance by local people, and worried that it would show the host country in a poor light in front of the state guest, the government went into overdrive trying to launch the POSCO project just ahead of the visit.19 Instead of paying heed to local concerns and working with the concerned populations to find an acceptable resolution, newspapers reported that “[t]he Prime Minister’s Office (PMO), the external affairs ministry and the steel ministry have thrown their might behind the project …” and that “[g]overnment channels are working overtime to clear hurdles faced by the steel giant and consultations are on with the Orissa government to expedite the process.”20
When it was clear that the project could not be launched in time for President Lee’s visit, the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) held a news conference, where MEA Joint Secretary (East), Mr. Gautam Bimbawale, and a MEA spokesperson, Vishnu Prakash, both reiterated that the state and central governments were trying their best to “pave the way for the initiation of the project.”21 The fact that environmental clearance had been accorded to the project by the Ministry of Environment and Forests was proffered as evidence of the central government’s intention to “clear all hurdles” for the POSCO project.  Union Steel Minister, Virbhadra Singh, who met with the POSCO delegation accompanying President Lee, told reporters that “[e]fforts are being made to ensure that the entire matter is seen[sic], signed and delivered in the next 4-5 months. This includes physical transfer of land and all regulatory clearances to POSCO.” 22
Because the government did not consider conditions in Orissa to be ‘suitable’ for President Lee to visit the POSCO site, the Orissa Chief Minister Naveen Patnaik came to New Delhi to meet and reassure him of progress on the POSCO project.  Newspapers reported Mr. Patnaik as saying that he had “assured the South Korean President that Posco project work will be expedited,” and that the state government would speed up land acquisition for the project.23

SPEAKASIA investigation query to PMO


To:- Ms. Sanjukta Ray, (or incumbent) Central Public Information Officer, PrimeMinister's Office, South Block, New Delhi - 110101.
cc:-  Shri K. Salil Kumar,  (or incumbent) Central Public Information Officer, Prime
Minister's Office, South Block, New Delhi - 110101
 

dtd: 14th June 2011
Greetings & Jai Hind!!  Most humbly request information under the RTI Act of India, 2005,  please provide me with the following information. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT by me, an Indian Citizen, IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.
+++
INFORMATION REQUIRED:-

a) Enclosed please find copy of letter to Prime Minister from MONEYLIFE FOUNDATION of Mumbai, self-explanatory, Please provide information on processing of this letter at PMO after receipt, action taken or proposed to be taken in this context.

b) Please provide information on any other letters received on the subject of SPEAKASIA or similar by PMO.

c) Please provide information on whether Government employees are permitted to take part in such schemes which involve not just becoming members / consumers / panelists but also seeking out other members / consumers / panelists for a consideration or commission.

d) If any of the above said statutory records are not available, the complete details of how it was destroyed / weeded out in each case..

e) Electronic access to the catalogue (or catalogues) of all records of your public authority duly indexed in a manner and the form to facilitate right to information, either over the computer networks or in the form of a diskette or other electronic media at the prescribed fees.

Sent by eMail and signed hard copy, self-verified as citizen of India, (signed) and humbly submitted,
from:-Veeresh Malik,
D-61, Defence Colony,
New Delhi - 11oo24
(mobile: 00-91-99118-25500)

Note 1:-Application fee of Rs. 10/- in cash shall be submitted within 30 days as per procedure laid down by DoP&T at PIO, PMO, New Delhi, or at any one of the nominated APIOs located at the specified Post Offices in India, and a copy of this application along with receipt shall be sent to you co-terminus. Interim, you are requested to commence processing this RTI Application as per the RTI Act-2005 with effect from date of submission of this electronic copy, also as per the RTI Act-2005.

Note 2:- The public authority, PMO, New Delhi, has not yet published their arrangements to accept / accompany electronic payments for e-filings as per section 6 of the Information Technology Act 2000, is requested to do same, - and hence I am constrained to go to extra expense / trouble to file a routine email request by Postal Department also.

Note 3:- I wish to specify that you may please not provide to me that information (or particular portion thereof) which would impede the prosecution of offenders under any law of India, and also any personal information which is unconnected with any public activity/interest or which invades the privacy of any person. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN THE LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.
Noe 4:- Humbly also submitted that section 8(2) of RTI Act clearly mentions that “A public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests”. In present case ven section 8(1)(j) is applicable for the information sought. Also it leaves no scope to invoke section 11 of RTI Act for seeking ‘third party’ comments. However since various CIC-verdicts allow protection in form of hiding certain information likely to be misused, bank-details etc in the sought information may be hided by putting a whitener on the relevant portions of the documents to be provided.  In case RTI petition relates to some other public-authority, please transfer this RTI petition to CPIO there under section 6(3) of RTI Act.
(Postal-order number ___92E 363083 dtd 17jun2011____ for rupees ten is enclosed with signed hard-copy towards RTI fees in name of “Accounts Officer” as per DoPT circular-number No.F.10/9/2008-IR dated 05.12.2008.)
+++

Delhi International Airports Ltd - DIAL - now under RTI, too . . . .

from
Veeresh Malik veereshmalik@gmail.com

to
mailto:toArun.Arora@gmrgroup.in,
"Chairman@gmrgroup.co.in" <chairman@gmrgroup.co.in>,
Feedbackigia.DIAL@gmrgroup.in,
meena.raghunathan@gmrgroup.co.in


cc
"Malik, Veeresh" <veereshmalik@gmail.com>


date
15 June 2011 11:21

subject
RTI Application / DIAL / 15Jun2011 /  DIAL


To:- Sh. Dharmedera Yadav, CPIO under RTI Act of India 2005, (or incumbent), Associate Gen. Manager (Security), Delhi International Air Port Ltd.I.G.I. Air Port, New Delhi110037.

cc:  The Managing Director, Delhi International Air Port Ltd. I.G.I. Air Port, New Delhi110037


dtd: 15th June 2011

Greetings & Jai Hind!!  Most humbly request information under the RTI Act of India, 2005,  please provide me with the following information. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT by me, an Indian Citizen, IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.
+++
INFORMATION REQUIRED:-


a) Please provide me with information pertaining to adherence  to RTI Act of India 2005, by DIAL, Public Authority under RTI Act of India, 2005, with order by Central Information Commission vide http://www.rti.india.gov.in/cic_decisions/CIC_OP_A_2009_000129_T_55659.pdf, copy enclosed, dated 27th April 2011

b) Please provide me with information on criteria used by DIAL to permit free parking of motor vehicles owned by diplomats using blue registration plate CD motor vehicles at Delhi Airport.

c) Please provide me with information on criteria used by DIAL in removal of adherence to RTI Act of India from the original model concession agreement for PPP agreements.

d) If any of the above said statutory records are not available, the complete details of how it was destroyed / weeded out in each case..
e) Electronic access to the catalogue (or catalogues) of all records of your public authority duly indexed in a manner and the form to facilitate right to information, either over the computer networks or in the form of a diskette or other electronic media at the prescribed fees.
Sent by eMail and signed hard copy, self-verified as citizen of India, (signed) and humbly submitted,



from:-Veeresh Malik,
D-61, Defence Colony,
New Delhi - 11oo24
(mobile: 00-91-99118-25500)
Note 1:-Application fee of Rs. 10/- in cash shall be submitted within 30 days as per procedure laid down by DoP&T at PIO, DIAL, New Delhi, or at any one of the nominated APIOs located at the specified Post Offices in India, and a copy of this application along with receipt shall be sent to you co-terminus. Interim, you are requested to commence processing this RTI Application as per the RTI Act-2005 with effect from date of submission of this electronic copy, also as per the RTI Act-2005.
Note 2:- The public authority, DIAL, New Delhi, has not yet published their arrangements to accept / accompany electronic payments for e-filings as per section 6 of the Information Technology Act 2000, is requested to do same, - and hence I am constrained to go to extra expense / trouble to file a routine email request by Postal Department also.
Note 3:- I wish to specify that you may please not provide to me that information (or particular portion thereof) which would impede the prosecution of offenders under any law of India, and also any personal information which is unconnected with any public activity/interest or which invades the privacy of any person. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN THE LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.

Noe 4:- Humbly also submitted that section 8(2) of RTI Act clearly mentions that “A public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests”. In present case ven section 8(1)(j) is applicable for the information sought. Also it leaves no scope to invoke section 11 of RTI Act for seeking ‘third party’ comments. However since various CIC-verdicts allow protection in form of hiding certain information likely to be misused, bank-details etc in the sought information may be hided by putting a whitener on the relevant portions of the documents to be provided.  In case RTI petition relates to some other public-authority, please transfer this RTI petition to CPIO there under section 6(3) of RTI Act.

(Postal-order number ___92E 363083 dtd 17jun2011_ for rupees ten is enclosed with signed hard-copy towards RTI fees in name of “Accounts Officer” as per DoPT circular-number No.F.10/9/2008-IR dated 05.12.2008.)

Sunday, 19 June 2011

And how I shall try to make POSCO in India a "public authority"

Under the RTI Act of India 2005, a "Public Authority" is now well-defined, and can certainly include joint ventures, NGOs, VOs as well as companies which have been "substantially financed" and fit into other aspects of being "public authorities".

POSCO in India is one such company. However, you would appreciate, to start with they make it difficult to even accept such RTI Applications. The way to do it is to make the application, and then send it along with the 10/- rupee Postal Order, by Registered Post. In the format below, as I have done.

It will be a struggle, no doubt, but that's life. Right? Every day a new struggle.

+++

from
Veeresh Malik veereshmalik@gmail.com

to:-

jgyoo@posco.co.kr,varun-sehgal21@yahoo.com,
simanta@posco-india.com


cc

esg@esgindia.org,
anivar.aravind@gmail.com,
sanket_bbs@yahoo.com,
sanket_delhi@yahoo.com,
"Malik, Veeresh" <veereshmalik@gmail.com>


date
10 June 2011 17:10:21 UTC+5:30

subject: RTI Application / POSCO / 10jun2011 /


To:-  The CPIO under RTI Act of India 2005 or incumbent, POSCO-India Private Limited, 116, Park Centra(1st Floor) Tower-B, Opposite 32nd Milestone, NH-8, Sector-30, Gurgaon-122001


dtd: 10th June 2011 . . .
Greetings & Jai Hind!!  Most humbly request information under the RTI Act of India, 2005,  please provide me with the following information. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.
+++
INFORMATION REQUIRED:-

a) Please provide me with full information pertaining to adherence of POSCO INDIA Pvt. Ltd. to RTI Act of India 2005.

b) Please provide me with full information pertaining to the various taxation adherences and status of M/s POSCO and/or their Indian subsidiary M/s POSCO India Pvt. Ltd. claiming that they have spent Rs 3000 crores in India so far and if CBDT has any information on this heavy expense. (source: Media report per: http://www.telegraphindia.com/1110420/jsp/orissa/story_13877351.jsp quote:
""Bhubaneswar, April 19: Posco India Limited has so far spent Rs 3,000 crore in its proposed steel plant near Paradip though the project still remains stuck with the company yet to take possession of even an inch of land at the site. The company’s investments came to light during an ongoing review meeting chaired by steel and mines minister Raghunath Mohanty.""

c) Please provide me with full information on expenses incurred by M/s POSCO and/or their Indian subsidiary M/s POSCO India Pvt. Ltd. on any travel/junket or other expenses on Indian officials, journalists and other people not connected with the day-to-day regular work of POSCO and/or their Indian subsidiary M/s POSCO India Pvt. Ltd.

d) If any of the above said statutory records are not available, the complete details of how it was destroyed / weeded out in each case.

e) Electronic access to the catalogue (or catalogues) of all records of your public authority duly indexed in a manner and the form to facilitate right to information, either over the computer networks or in the form of a diskette or other electronic media at the prescribed fees.

Sent by eMail and signed hard copy, self-verified, (signed) and humbly submitted,


from:-Veeresh Malik,
D-61, Defence Colony,
New Delhi - 11oo24
(mobile: 00-91-99118-25500)

Note 1:-Application fee of Rs. 10/- in cash shall be submitted within 30 days as per procedure laid down by DoP&T at PIO, Posco India Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi, or at any one of the nominated APIOs located at the specified Post Offices in India, and a copy of this application along with receipt shall be sent to you co-terminus. Interim, you are requested to commence processing this RTI Application as per the RTI Act-2005 with effect from date of submission of this electronic copy, also as per the RTI Act-2005.
Note 2:- The public authority, POSCO India Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, has not yet published their arrangements to accept / accompany electronic payments for e-filings as per section 6 of the Information Technology Act 2000, is requested to do same, - and hence I am constrained to go to extra expense / trouble to file a routine email request by Postal Department also.
Note 3:- I wish to specify that you may please not provide to me that information (or particular portion thereof) which would impede the prosecution of offenders under any law of India, and also any personal information which is unconnected with any public activity/interest or which invades the privacy of any person. THIS INFORMATION IS SOUGHT IN THE LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST, AND THERE IS OVER-RIDING PARAMOUNT LARGER PUBLIC INTEREST TO BE GIVEN THE INFORMATION I HAVE ASKED FOR.
Noe 4:- Humbly also submitted that section 8(2) of RTI Act clearly mentions that “A public authority may allow access to information, if public interest in disclosure outweighs the harm to the protected interests”. In present case ven section 8(1)(j) is applicable for the information sought. Also it leaves no scope to invoke section 11 of RTI Act for seeking ‘third party’ comments. However since various CIC-verdicts allow protection in form of hiding certain information likely to be misused, bank-details etc in the sought information may be hided by putting a whitener on the relevant portions of the documents to be provided.  In case RTI petition relates to some other public-authority, please transfer this RTI petition to CPIO there under section 6(3) of RTI Act.

(Postal-order number __________________ _______________ for rupees ten is enclosed with signed hard-copy towards RTI fees in name of “Accounts Officer” as per DoPT circular-number No.F.10/9/2008-IR dated 05.12.2008.)

+++